VARIAN V. SCOTT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VARIAN V. SCOTT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
866 So. 2d 213
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Varían V. Scott appeals an order denying his motion for discharge under the speedy trial rule. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition and deny it on the merits. The subsequent plea bargain entered into by defendant-appellant Scott waived his claim of a violation of the speedy trial rule. Monge v. State, 286 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). We need not reach the alternative argument that defense counsel had obtained continuances which waived the speedy trial period in any event.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sydoriak v. State, 947 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…so State ex rel. Wilhoit v. Wells, 356 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 359 So. 2d 1222 (Fla.1978). By virtue of the entry and acceptance of appellant’s nolo contendere plea, appellant waived his right to a speedy trial. See Scott v. State, 866 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Cambrick v. State, 593 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.…
-
King v. State, 965 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…reement specifically waived the appellant’s right to appeal on the grounds now asserted, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992); Alexander v. Judd, 930 So. 2d 847, 848 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Scott v. State, 866 So. 2d 213, 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see also Carlin v. State, 939 So. 2d 245, 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).…
Authorities Cited
- Monge v. State, 286 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)