FELIX L. JONES, PETITIONER,
v.
THE PANTRY, INC., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Reconsideration cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
By the filing of a notice of appeal, petitioner seeks review of the circuit court’s orders denying his motion for emergency stay and his motion for reconsideration. In the motions, petitioner sought to stay a county court decision pending appeal in the circuit court. We find that the orders are renewable by petition for writ of certiorari rather than by appeal.
Although petitioner attempts to raise claims regarding the county court’s decision, the only orders before this court for review are the circuit court’s interlocutory orders denying petitioner’s motions. Because a motion for reconsideration does not toll the time for filing a certiorari petition directed to an interlocutory order, see Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Bond, 696 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny petitioner’s request for disqualification of the judges from the Eighth Judicial Circuit.
BOOTH, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J. Antonio Aldrete, M.D. v. Dep't of Health Bd. of Med., 879 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ation, and the Board, in choosing a penalty, to weigh numerous factors. Ultimately, the decision rests within the Board’s sound discretion. See Marrero v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., 622 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Lusskin v. [*1247] Dep’t of Health, 866 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2004). We cannot say on appeal that Dr. Aldrete’s penalty was excessive based on the allegation that others, in Dr. Aldrete’s opinion, received more favorable treatment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. On remand the B…
-
Manuel Fernandez, R.N. v. Fla. Dep't of Health, 82 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…nowledge that section 456.079(3), Florida Statutes (2008), gives the Board discretion to depart from the guidelines and impose a harsher penalty when there are aggravating circumstances. See 456.079(3), Fla. Stat. (2008); Lusskin v. Dep’t of Health, 866 So. 2d 733, 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Arias, 710 So. 2d at 659 (citing Criminal Justice Standards & Training Comm’n v. Bradley, 596 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla.1992)). The final order on review does not articulate those “[circumstances which may be considered for purp…
Authorities Cited
- Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Bond, 696 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)