WILLIAM MARKHAM, AS BROWARD COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, APPELLANT,
v.
MARC GOLD AND BARBARA GOLD, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2004-03-03
No. 4D02-4361
STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
866 So. 2d 777 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*778] PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221 (Fla.2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So. 2d 356 (Fla.1998).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gold v. Rodriguez, 914 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for attorney’s fees and sanctions after a remand following an appeal in this court. See Markham v. Gold, 866 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We hold that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in finding that the property appraiser’s attorney’s conduct in connection with false and frivolous allegations contained in an amended complaint was not sufficiently egre…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw