TIVAN JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-02-04
No. 3D03-3012
Before COPE, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
867 So. 2d 449 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); Colon v. State, 730 So. 2d 780, 781-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thomas v. State, 905 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …ing a corrected scoresheet for the burglary would not affect his overall sentence and would therefore be an exercise in futility. See State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287 (Fla.2003); McCoy v. State, 876 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Richmond v. State, 867 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Hummel v. State, 782 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We therefore affirm the order under review. Affirmed.…
  • Richmond v. State, 876 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …3.800(a). To the extent that defendant-appellant Richmond argues for correction of the sentencing guidelines scoresheet, or that she should be re-scored on a different scoresheet, we affirm the order denying relief on authority of Richmond v. State, 867 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). The defendant argues that she is not being awarded the correct amount of gain time under the gain time statute. See generally § 944.275, Fla. Stat. (2003). Under established precedent, the defendant must first exhaust her admin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw