MILAN TODOROVIC, APPELLANT,
v.
ARCTIC AIR OF CENTRAL FLORIDA AND AMERICAN ALL-RISK ADMINISTRATORS, APPELLEES
MILAN TODOROVIC, APPELLANT,
ARCTIC AIR OF CENTRAL FLORIDA AND AMERICAN ALL-RISK ADMINISTRATORS, APPELLEES
867 So. 2d 471
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of final worker’s compensation order denying compensation. The JCC determined that Claimant failed to provide timely notice of his injury and that Claimant did not meet the exceptions to the timely notice requirement in section 440.185(1), Florida Statutes (2000). However, having reviewed the undisputed facts in this case, we hold that these facts do fall within the exceptional circumstances exception in section 440.185(l)(d). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying compensation and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
BOOTH, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
McKENNA v. McKENNA, 31 So. 3d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…, 2009, an amount agreed to by counsel.” According to the father, the trial court misinterpreted his counsel’s agreement regarding retroactive child support. The standard of review for a child support award is abuse of discretion. Karimi v. Karimi, 867 So. 2d 471, 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Although the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes, do not address a split custody situation, where, as here, both parties earn income, it is an abuse of discretion not to award both parties…
-
Lopez v. Lopez, 135 So. 3d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…uct results in the depletion or dissipation of a marital asset, a trial court may make an unequal distribution of marital property, or may assign the asset to the dissipating spouse as part of that spouse’s equitable distribution.” Karimi v. Karimi, 867 So. 2d 471, 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citing Bush, 824 So. 2d 293; Romano v. Romano, 632 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)). One party’s use of an asset out of necessity and for reasonable living expenses does not justify an award of a depleted asset absent eviden…
-
Chamberlain v. Eisinger, 159 So. 3d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…he Mother failed to- provide evidence to support her argument, we affirm. Child Support “The standard of review for a child support award is abuse of discretion.” McKenna v. McKenna, 31 So. 3d 890, 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citing Karimi v. Karimi, 867 So. 2d 471, 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). On this issue, the Mother argues the trial court incorrectly included unpaid alimony to decrease the Father’s income and increase her income in the calculation of child support. The trial court found that the modification…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence