JENNY CASON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bondi v. Tucker, 93 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …ppeal the order under section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Id. at 210. Section 120.68 has no application in the present case, and we are aware of no authority for post-final-order intervention in Parole Commission cases. See generally Ahlers v. Wilson, 867 So. 2d 524, 527 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing lack of administrative procedures analogous to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 as basis for granting writ of certiorari in workers’ compensation case). It is also clear in the present case that the Attorne…
• Smith v. Chepolis, 896 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …a party. The very point of his argument on appeal is that he should not have been treated as if he were a party. We have recognized that a nonparty who is adversely affected by an order may be entitled to review by certiorari. See Ahlers v. Wilson, 867 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); State ex rel. Boyles v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 436 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). It is a short step from these decisions to conclude that a nonparty whose rights are directly adjudicated in a final order has…
• Dep't OF Transp. v. Baird, 992 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …Consequently, appellate courts in Florida have held that a nonparty whose rights are directly affected by an order may obtain review by certiorari even though that person or entity was not a party in the lower tribunal. See, e.g., Ahlers v. Wilson, 867 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); State ex rel. Boyles v. Fla. Parole and Prob. Comm’n, 436 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The same would hold true for a nonparty whose rights are directly affected by an appellate decision. As one of the toll enforcement agenci…

Authorities Cited

• Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)
• Paulk v. State, 765 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)