ANTWAIN S. KELLY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-03-01
No. 1D04-0090
ERVIN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
867 So. 2d 552 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Brown v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 763 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

ERVIN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bryant v. McDONOUGH, 932 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …DCA 2004). Finally, we deny petitioner’s request that we undertake review of the order granting him leave to proceed as an indigent in the circuit court, again without prejudice to his right to seek review on plenary appeal. See LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…
  • Babij v. Dep't OF Corr., 931 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …motion for relief from an order that found him to be indigent but placed a lien on his inmate trust account to recover court costs and fees related to his filing of a petition for writ of mandamus in that forum. As we noted in LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), rule 9.430 only authorizes the review of an order of a lower tribunal relating to a request to proceed as an indigent in appellate proceedings. We therefore treated [*1050] the motion for review as a petition for writ of certior…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw