STEVEN ALLMOND, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
STEVEN ALLMOND, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
867 So. 2d 552
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied as proeedurally barred. Denhart v. Dugger, 567 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant v. McDONOUGH, 932 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…DCA 2004). Finally, we deny petitioner’s request that we undertake review of the order granting him leave to proceed as an indigent in the circuit court, again without prejudice to his right to seek review on plenary appeal. See LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…
-
Babij v. Dep't OF Corr., 931 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…motion for relief from an order that found him to be indigent but placed a lien on his inmate trust account to recover court costs and fees related to his filing of a petition for writ of mandamus in that forum. As we noted in LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), rule 9.430 only authorizes the review of an order of a lower tribunal relating to a request to proceed as an indigent in appellate proceedings. We therefore treated [*1050] the motion for review as a petition for writ of certior…
Authorities Cited
- Denhart v. Dugger, 567 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)