CLIFFORD J. PITTMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the revocation of Pittman's probation for driving with a suspended license as a habitual offender, but remanded for entry of a formal order specifying the exact probation conditions violated.
A probation revocation is affirmed where the defendant admitted to violating probation conditions, but remanded for entry of a formal order specifying which conditions were violated.
[1] A probation revocation order must specify the particular conditions of probation that were violated by the defendant.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClifford Pittman's probation was revoked after he admitted to violations listed in an affidavit of violation of probation, including driving while lic…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Traffic Offender cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Clifford Pittman appeals a new judgment and sentence entered after the cir cuit court revoked his probation for driving while license suspended as a habitual offender.1 Mr. Pittman entered a plea of admission to the violations listed in the affidavit of violation of probation. The circuit court entered a new judgment and sentence indicating that Mr. Pittman had violated probation in this case, thus providing this court with jurisdiction to review the revocation. However, the court did not enter a formal order revoking Mr. Pittman’s probation and listing the specific conditions violated. We affirm the revocation, but because there was some confusion at the change of plea hearing, we remand for the circuit court to enter an order revoking probation that specifies that Mr. Pittman admitted violating conditions 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 9 of his probation, as charged in the affidavit of violation. Mr. Pittman’s admission did not include the new law violation of burglary.
Affirmed but remanded with instructions.
ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY and YILLANTI, JJ., Concur. . Mr. Pittman's notice of appeal referenced two trial court case numbers: the revocation of probation addressed here and a separate judgment and sentence for burglary. However, Mr. Pittman’s brief challenges only the revocation of probation case.