MARIA GALLO, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, APPELLEE
MARIA GALLO, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, APPELLEE
867 So. 2d 1273
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 9, 2003, the Court has determined that, because the order on appeal has. not been filed with the agency clerk, it has not been rendered. See Hill v. Division of Retirement, 687 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(describing the essential attributes of reviewable final orders under the Administrative Procedure Act). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.
BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Siegers Seed Co. v. Williams Farm P'ship, 17 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…the Council’s recommendation was filed with the agency clerk. An agency does not render a final order until it is filed with the agency clerk. See Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Gallo v. Florida Comm’n on Human Relations, 867 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h) (“An order is rendered when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal.”). An order must be rendered in order to invoke appellate jurisdiction, United Water Fla., Inc.…
Authorities Cited
- Hill v. Division OF Retirement, 687 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)