MARIE CHANTAL MERLE, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH MERLE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-02-11
Nos. 3D03-1912, 3D03-2883
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and WELLS, JJ.
868 So. 2d 574 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robles v. Robles, 860 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Thompkins, 891 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …rder after holding a hearing under Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923). Not long before that, the third district had certified as a question of great public importance the admissibility of polygraph results in State v. Narval Hardware, 868 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Subsequently, however, our supreme court declined to review the certified question. Hardware v. State, 885 So. 2d 387 (Fla.2004). In Hardware the third district quashed an order of the trial court setting a Frye hearing to deter…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw