STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
STEVEN RIFICE, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2004-03-10
No. 4D03-3510
STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
868 So. 2d 1213 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This case is reversed and remanded to the county court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in State v. Montello & Costa, 867 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ness v. Martinez, 249 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  • …ppellees and reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount. The appellees appeal this order, but an order that only determines entitlement -to attorney’s fees and does not set the amount is a nonfinal and nonappealable order. Salem v. Abram, [*782] 868 So. 2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also Garcia v. Valladares, 99 So. 3d 518, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“Appellant, Maria Garcia, appeals from a [nonfinal] order finding entitlement to costs and attorney-fees .... Because the order, however, does not determ…
  • Wamsley v. Wamsley, 957 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
    …issolution action below. We dismiss his challenge to the trial court’s ruling that Ann Marie Wamsley (the Wife) is entitled to attorney’s fees. Because the trial court did not determine a fee amount, that order is not appealable. See Salem v. Abram, 868 So. 2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We affirm the trial court’s rulings on the Husband’s remaining issues without further discussion. In her cross-appeal, the Wife argues that the trial court erred in excluding business “pass-through” income and employment b…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw