ADONIUS P. BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ADONIUS P. BAILEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
869 So. 2d 13
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to any right Bailey might have to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if he wishes to challenge the factual accuracy of the trial court’s records concerning the dates he was in jail. See King v. State, 809 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Angelo's Aggregate Materials, Ltd. v. Pasco Cnty., 118 So. 3d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…regarding the "P/SP” designation. . We observe that, in Florida, "equitable es-toppel is a defensive doctrine rather than a cause of action.” Meyer v. Meyer, 25 So. 3d 39, 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (quoting Agency for Health Care Admin. v. MIED, Inc., 869 So. 2d 13, 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)). .See generally ch. 86, Fla. Stat. (2011). The law creating the Act only refers to the Act as such in its preamble, and there is therefore no reference to the "Declaratory Judgment Act” in the Florida statutes. Ch. 21820, L…
-
Bair v. City OF Clearwater, 196 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…C, 120 So. 3d at 29-30 (recognizing that equitable estoppel may be invoked to support a Bert Harris Act claim if a property owner relies in good faith upon the governmental action in question); cf. State, Agency for Health Care Admin. v. MIED, Inc., 869 So. 2d 13, 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (rejecting plaintiffs equitable estoppel claim where it was brought as a stand-alone cause of action “rather than as a supporting theory, for some other equitable remedy”). However, this court and others hold that “equitable…
-
Daron Meyer v. Meyer, 25 So. 3d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…sserted in his claims for specific performance, Daron attempted to plead equitable estoppel as a cause of action. “In this state, equitable estoppel is a defensive doctrine rather than a cause of action.” Agency for Health Care Admin. v. MIED, Inc., 869 So. 2d 13, 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). “Florida has long recognized that ‘[ejquita-ble estoppel is not designed to aid a litigant in gaining something, but only in preventing a loss.’ ” Id. (quoting Kerivan v. Fogal, 156 Fla. 92, 22 So. 2d 584, 586 (1945)). Becau…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- King v. State, 809 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Norman v. State, 809 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)