GEORGE HUFF, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of the appellant’s postconviction claims. We write only to address the appellant’s claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object when the trial court read the forcible felony instruction to the jury. Upon a full review of the record, we conclude that, in this case, the trial court’s inclusion of the forcible felony instruction within the overall body of instruction on self-defense was not misleading or confusing and did not deprive the appellant of his defense of self-defense. See Giles v. State, 831 So. 2d 1263, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Accordingly, the trial court’s summary denial is AFFIRMED.
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Headley v. City OF Miami, 118 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…t DCA 2005) (“On judicial review of PERC orders, the view of the PERC majority is, we have often said, presumptively the product of special expertise to which courts should defer.”); Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am. v. Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., 869 So. 2d 608, 610-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“PERC’s decisions are entitled to great deference by the courts due to its enlightened experience in such matters. PERC has developed special expertise in addressing labor issues and is uniquely qualified to interpret an…
-
Andrea J.B. Cagle v. ST. Johns Cnty. Sch. Dist., 939 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…urts have recognized that PERC has developed special expertise in addressing labor issues and is uniquely qualified to interpret and apply the policies enunciated in chapter 447. See Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am. v. Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., 869 So. 2d 608, 610 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Sch. Bd. of Dade County v. Dade Teachers Ass’n, 421 So. 2d 645, 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Thus, its decisions on this area of law are entitled to considerable deference by this Court. See Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am.; Sch.…
-
Sch. Dist. OF Indian River Cnty. v. Fla. Pub. Emps. Relations Comm'n & Indian River Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 64 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…effect is negotiable if it is “direct and substantial.” Jacksonville Supervisors Ass’n, 25 FPER ¶ 30289 at 579; see also Hillsborough Classroom Teachers Ass’n, 7 FPER ¶ 12411 at 907; Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am. v. Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., 869 So. 2d 608, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (impact bargaining is not required where the bargaining unit “failed to establish direct and substantial effects upon the terms and conditions of employment”). The District argues that it is not required to impact bargain o…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lamonda D. Giles v. State, 831 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)