STEVEN DALE LILLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. O'Hearn, 975 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …rari jurisdiction to review an order denying a motion to dismiss even when the cause of action is one for first-party bad faith. See Federated Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Copeland, 932 So. 2d 310, 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Progressive Consumers Ins. Co. v. Day, 869 So. 2d 621, 622 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hess, 814 So. 2d 1240, 1243 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co., 515 So. 2d 998, 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (en banc). These bad faith cases follow the general…
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Brewer, 940 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …te remedy to review the alleged erroneous order. See Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Harrell, 891 So. 2d 1078, 1078-79 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Its concern appears to involve the time and expense of litigation. We find Progressive Consumers Insurance Co. v. Day, 869 So. 2d 621, 622 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), and the cases cited therein, to be instructive: Petitioner ... ask[s] this Court to quash the ... order denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss the respondent's] ... bad faith claim.... Petitioner has failed to show that it…
• Federated Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Copeland, 932 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …t be adequately remedied on appeal. See Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097, 1099-1100 (Fla.1987) (stating that motions to dismiss and motions to strike claims should not be reviewed by certiorari); Progressive Consumers Ins. Co. v. Day, 869 So. 2d 621, 622 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (denying certiorari review of a trial court’s denial of petitioner’s motion to dismiss a bad faith claim). We, therefore, dismiss the petition without prejudice to Federated to seek a writ of certiorari in this court if th…

Authorities Cited

• Antone v. State, 382 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1980)
• Johnson v. State, 696 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 1997)
• Anton Kevin Peterson v. State, 382 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1980)