CATHERINE BLACKWOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2004-03-31
No. 4D02-4399
GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur., FARMER, C.J., concurs in result only.
869 So. 2d 656 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Catherine Blackwood appealed the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration's denial of her request for an administrative hearing regarding the agency's decision to deny her assisted-living facility license. The court affirmed the agency's denial, holding that Blackwood's request for hearing was legally insufficient under the applicable administrative rules because it failed to provide a concise statement of the ultimate facts she disputed.


Holding

AHCA properly denied Blackwood's request for an administrative hearing because it failed to comply with the requirement in Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.201(2)(e) to provide a concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts warranting reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action. Blackwood's petition did not address the specific statement in the notice of intent to deny regarding her status as a confirmed perpetrator of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.


Headnotes

[1] A request for an administrative hearing must state the material facts that the petitioner disputes.

[2] A petition for an administrative hearing must include a concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reve…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“[u]nless otherwise provided by law, a petition or request for hearing shall include those items required by the uniform rules adopted pursuant to s. 120.54(5)(b)4.”

Establishes the statutory requirement that petitions for hearing must comply with uniform rules

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

On May 17, 2002, AHCA sent Blackwood a notice of intent to deny her assisted-living facility license renewal, citing that she was listed as a confirme…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Catherine Blackwood appeals the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration’s final order denying her request for an administrative hearing regarding the agency’s notice of intent to deny her license to operate an assisted-living facility.

On May 17, 2002, the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) sent Blackwood a notice of intent to deny indicating that: “St. Catherine T.L.C., Inc.’s assisted living facility (ALF) license renewal application is DENIED.”

As the basis for the denial, AHCA specified: “Pursuant to section 400.414(l)(f), Florida Statutes ... you do not meet the level 2 background screening requirements under section 435.04(4)(a), F.S., as evidenced by your being listed as a confirmed perpetrator of abuse, neglect or exploita tion in Department of Children and Family Services, Final Order Case No. 98-3320C ... dated August 20,1999.”

Blackwood requested a formal administrative hearing and later filed an amended request in response to an order to show cause issued by AHCA. AHCA entered a final order denying Blackwood’s request for hearing on October 22, 2002. As amended, the order stated that Blackwood received the notice of intent to deny on May 22, 2002 and AHCA received the request for hearing on June 17, 2002. It further stated that Black-wood’s response to AHCA’s order to show cause did not cure the noted defects. Because it found that Blackwood’s request for hearing was untimely filed and that she failed to cure the defects in her request for a hearing, AHCA denied a formal hearing.

AHCA was required to deny a hearing because the request was legally insufficient.

Section 120.569(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2001) provides that: “[u]nless otherwise provided by law, a petition or request for hearing shall include those items required by the uniform rules adopted pursuant to s. 120.54(5)(b)4.” AHCA stated in its notice of intent to deny that “[Blackwood’s] request for an administrative hearing must conform to the requirements in [rule] 28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and must state the material facts [she] dispute[s].”

As AHCA noted, Blackwood’s amended request for a hearing failed to provide a “concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency’s proposed action.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.201(2)(e); see also Brookwood Extended Care Ctr. of Homestead, LLP v. Agency for Healthcare Admin., 870 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug.13, 2003). In neither her original request for a hearing, nor her amended request, did Blackwood address the specific statement in the notice of intent to deny, which stated that she was a confirmed perpetrator of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. AHCA properly denied Blackwood’s request for a hearing. See § 120.569(2)(c) (“A petition shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with these requirements or [if] it has been untimely filed.”) (emphasis added). Because we find that the denial was proper on this ground, we do not address the timeliness issue.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur. FARMER, C.J., concurs in result only.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Washington v. DeBeaugrine, 658 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (N.D. Fla. 2009)
    …of the factual allegations. See Fla. Stat. § 120.57(1) (providing for a hearing only when there is a disputed issue of material fact); Fla. Admin. Code. Ann. r. 28-106.201(2)(e)-(f) (setting out pleading requirements); Blackwood v. AHCA, 869 So.2d 656 (4th DCA 2004) (upholding the denial of a hearing for failure to adequately allege a disputed issue of material fact). When these requirements are met, the person is entitled to a hearing with the full range of procedural rights available under the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw