MICHAEL KOT, APPELLANT,
v.
BRUNI HOLMBERG, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
In determining the petition for incapacity of Rosalie J. Klein, the probate court heard testimony regarding the execution of an amendment to Ms. Klein’s revocable trust. Although the trust was not before the court, in its order determining incapacity the court adjudged “that the 1994 trust agreement continues in full force and effect and the assets of the ward shall be continued to be controlled by the then nominated guardian Bruni Holmberg.” The validity of the trust was never before the court for determination, as appellee concedes and the court acknowledged in other parts of the order. Therefore, we affirm the order, except as to the foregoing statement, which on remand we direct be stricken from the order. WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bedwell v. State, 878 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…oint. Having reviewed the motion, the state’s responses, and the records provided, we hold that the plea colloquy and forms do not conclusively refute Bedwell’s claim of misadvice associated with his entitlement to gain time. See Griffin v. State, 869 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); see also State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235 (Fla.1996). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand for the trial court to [*424] conduct an evidentiary hearing to address the merits of BedwelFs claim. STEVENSON…
-
Thomas v. State, 888 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…er, “yes” to the judge’s questions during the plea colloquy. The' plea colloquy and forms do not conclusively refute Thomas’ claims. State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235 (Fla.1996); Lewis v. State, 795 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Griffin v. State, 869 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). The plea colloquy and forms established that Thomas was aware that he would be sentenced to prison as a youthful offender. This, however, is not inconsistent with Thomas’ claim that counsel told him that he would be allowed in…