JOHN BALLESTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-04-14
No. 3D02-1588
Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
869 So. 2d 1261 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the denial of the defendant's motion for postconviction relief, finding the trial court's ruling supported by competent substantial evidence.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant appealed an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court had previously found good cause to overcome the time bar…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying the motion of defendant-appellant Balles- ter for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The proceeding below was an evidentiary hearing on remand from Ballester v. State, 781 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

The trial court found that the defendant had shown good ground for relief from the time bar of Rule 3.850. See Demps v. State, 696 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The trial court denied the motion as being impermissibly successive and, alternatively, on the merits.

For simplicity we assume (without deciding) that there was no successiveness bar. On the merits, the trial court rejected the defendant’s claim that his trial counsel had been ineffective with respect to the issue of voluntary intoxication. We affirm because this ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Machin v. State, 867 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Further, the claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise the defendant of the potential consequences of future recidivism was correctly rejected on authority of Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla.2002).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw