PETER TOMASELLO, JR., AS RECEIVER OF THE COCOA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
AMY NISBET, A WIDOW, ET AL., APPELLEES
PETER TOMASELLO, JR., AS RECEIVER OF THE COCOA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
AMY NISBET, A WIDOW, ET AL., APPELLEES
110 Fla. 256
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Caution
Also reported at: 149 So. 483
Cited by 58 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (55 total)
-
Dorman v. Friendly, 146 Fla. 732 (Fla. 1941)…t has not jurisdiction of the children it has not jurisdiction of the subject matter to determine the right of custody as between the parties to the suit over which it may have jurisdiction. [*738] Neither the case of Minick v. Minick, 111 Fla. 469, 149 Sou. 483, 491, or Duke v. Duke, 109 Fla. 325, 147 Sou. 588, are in point. In neither case was the question of jurisdiction over the custody of children domiciled outside the State of Florida involved. In the Minick case the record showed that the father of…
-
Kiplinger v. Kiplinger, 147 Fla. 243 (Fla. 1941)…not to Section 4989 C. G. L. The residence of a party consists of fact and intention. Warren v. Warren, 73 Fla. 764, 75 So. 35, L. R. A. 1917E 490. Residence indicates place of abode, whether permanent or temporary. Minick v. Minick, 111 Fla. 469, 149 So. 483. A resident is one who lives at a place with no present intention of removing therefrom. Tracy v. Tracy, 62 N. J. E. 807, 48 Atl. 533. Whether or not a party is a resident is a question of law and fact to be settled or determined from the facts of e…
-
Beckwith v. Bailey, 119 Fla. 316 (Fla. 1935)…the last stated circumstances is not entitled to recognition in Florida insofar as the full faith and credit provision of the Federal Constitution is concerned. Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818, 110 Sou. Rep. 539; Minick v. Minick, 111 Fla. 469, 149 Sou. Rep. 483. The decree of the Idaho court may, however, be regarded as' valid and recognized in the courts of Florida, and should be so recognized by the law of comity between states, unless [*330] there is some good and valid reason to the contrary. See Herr…
Previewing 3 of 55 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence