KADEY-KROGEN YACHTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
CURT MARSH AND CURT MARSH, D/B/A K & A YACHT SALES, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
KADEY-KROGEN YACHTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
CURT MARSH AND CURT MARSH, D/B/A K & A YACHT SALES, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
870 So. 2d 831
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See North Dade Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. Dinner’s Place, Inc., 827 So. 2d 352, 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); American Somax Ventures v. Touma, 547 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Faith Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Anias, 206 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…itur does not agree to the remitted amount. See § 768.74(4), Fla. Stat. (2014). We also note that the final judgment improperly awarded post-verdict interest. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So. 2d 110, 114 (Fla.2002); Ford Motor Co. v. Jimenez, 870 So. 2d 831, 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“The Amerare decision establishes the general rule that interest is not awardable for the period after the verdict but before the judgment.”). Without discussion, we reject the other arguments raised by the Employer. Turnin…
Authorities Cited
- Am. Somax Ventures v. Touma, 547 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- N. Dade Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. Dinner's Place, Inc., 827 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)