LUIS G. JIMENEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
WSUA BROADCASTING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
LUIS G. JIMENEZ, APPELLANT,
WSUA BROADCASTING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
870 So. 2d 873
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Opinion of the Court
[*874] GERSTEN, J.
We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee WSUA Broadcasting Corporation’s motion for sanctions and to strike sham pleadings. The record fully supports the trial court’s findings that appellant Luis G. Jimenez’s complaint contained false factual averments and was tantamount to a fraud upon the court. See Meadows v. Edwards, 82 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1955); Rhea v. Hackney, 117 Fla. 62, 157 So. 190 (1934); City of Miami v. Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc., 849 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rhea v. Hackney, 117 Fla. 62 (Fla. 1934)
- Meadows v. Edwards, 82 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1955)
- Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- The City OF Miami v. The Urban League OF Greater Miami, Inc., 849 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)