JAMES R. DEMICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. White v. State, 866 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Jones v. State, 855 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Martin v. State, 864 So. 2d 589, 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Givens v. State, 851 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief. Again, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Duvall v. City OF Cape Coral, 468 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1985)…ts on the basis of the “special duty” doctrine of Modlin v. City of Miami Beach, 201 So. 2d 70 (Fla.1967), was granted. During the pendency of petitioners appeal from the dismissals, this Court issued Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 871 So. 2d 1010 (Fla.1979), abrogating the Modlin doctrine. The district court accordingly reversed the dismissal of petitioners’ complaints and remanded for further proceedings. Trial was had and the jury retired to consider its verdicts. Prior to the return of th…
-
Johnson v. State, 108 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…han broad-based community knowledge); Larzelere v. State, 676 So. 2d 394, 400 (Fla.1996) (no abuse of discretion in denying testimony derived from limited period of time, limited number of people, and narrow section of community); Gonzalez v. State, 871 So. 2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (reputation within family too narrow segment of community; source of evidence must be sufficiently broad to enhance its reliability); Wisinski v. State, 508 So. 2d 504, 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (reputation must be based on m…1 / 2
-
Palumbo v. The State of Fla. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm'n & the Fla. Bd. of Regents, 487 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…s Prairie State Park to adjoining Lake Wauberg, if indeed it would have been possible to do so. Such preventive measures as appellant’s allegations envision would be discretionary under the holding of Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 871 So. 2d 1010 (Fla.1979), thereby affording protection to ap-pellees under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is clear, however, that once the university undertook to open and operate the recreational facility (with or without the assistance of the Game and…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ferman Carlos Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Reyes v. State, 854 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Givens v. State, 851 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Martin v. State, 864 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
- Jones v. State, 855 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- White v. State, 866 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)