IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A CHILD. R.L.G., APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …ps only some of the Appellees incurred termite damage to their homes. Under FDUTPA, damages must be measured by the reduction in value of the agreements caused by the deceptive or unfair acts or practices. See id.; Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Petsch, 872 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that section 501.211 allows consumers to recover damages for only the diminished value of the services received). Consequently, issues pertaining to proof of damages will be identical for every member of the class, and th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Global Travel Mktg., Inc. v. Shea, 908 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 2005)
  …noted that generally applicable contract defenses under state law, such as fraud, duress, or unconseionability, may be applied to invalidate arbitration agreements without contravening section 2 of the FAA. Accord Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Petsch, 872 So. 2d 259, 264 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 884 So. 2d 23 (Fla.2004); Powertel, Inc. v. Bexley, 743 So. 2d 570, 573-74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The public policy of protecting children from waiver of their litigation rights, on which the Fourth District decisio…
• Betzaida Fonte v. AT&T Wireless Servs., Inc., 903 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …purpose of the applicable statute. See Romano, 861 So. 2d at 59 (holding limitations in arbitration agreement effectively defeated statutory remedies; court then unnecessarily discussed unconscionability analysis); Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Petsch, 872 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Holt v. O’Brien Imports of Fort Myers, Inc., 862 So. 2d 87, 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brasington v. EMC Corp., 855 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Flyer Printing Co., Inc. v. Hill, 805 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also Green…