CURTIS J. TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-04-28
No. 3D03-3229
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, and WELLS, JJ.
872 So. 2d 390 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Due to the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing the defendant under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Romero v. JB Painting & Waterproofing, Inc., 38 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
    …, and the JCC abused his discretion in determining otherwise. The JCC also erred in denying Claimant’s request for an EMA on the ground that Dr. Broom’s IME report was not sufficiently persuasive to establish a conflict. See Chapman v. Nationsbank, 872 So. 2d 390, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding JCC lacks authority to resolve conflicts between physician opinions once claimant has requested EMA). Dr. Broom’s IME report reveals he performed an IME based on Claimant’s October 10, 2008, work accident, and clear…
  • Citrus Pest Control & Claims Control, Inc. v. Brown, 913 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …t 640; Hernandez, 856 So. 2d at 1142. This is so regardless of whether the IME later opined that the statements at issue had no effect on his determination of a causal connection. Accordingly, we reverse the final order. Cf. Chapman v. Nationsbank, 872 So. 2d 390, 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (reversing the JCC’s order and remanding because it was not clear from an examination of the order whether the JCC found that the claimant had violated section 440.105(4)(b) and directing that, on remand, the JCC should rule…
  • Brown v. Vanguard Sec. & Claims Ctr., 7 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …IME) physicians. See Palm Springs Gen. Hosp. v. Cabrera, 698 So. 2d 1352, 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). “The JCC does not have the authority to resolve conflicts between physician opinions once the claimant has requested an EMA.” Chapman v. Nationsbank, 872 So. 2d 390, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Here, Dr. Goldstein, Claimant’s treating pulmonologist, testified that Claimant remained in need of ongoing treatment, and her exposure to construction dust remained the major contributing cause of her need for treatment.…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw