MICHAEL ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-05-17
No. 1D04-1190
BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
872 So. 2d 449 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal is reversed on the authority of Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Leon County for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …e effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of the courts.5 We first adopted rules authorizing an early form of electronic transmission for documents filed with the courts more than three decades ago, in 1979. See In re Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., 872 So. 2d 449, 463 (Fla.1979) (adopting Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.090 (Electronic Filing of Matters in all Proceedings Within the State Courts System), providing that any document may be filed with the court by an “electronic copying device”) (lat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw