MICHAEL K. HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant's motion for additional jail and prison credit was facially insufficient, and therefore affirmed the trial court's denial.
The appellant sought additional jail and prison credit against a Columbia County conviction. He claimed credit for time served in Jackson County Jail …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Time Served cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for additional jail and prison credit. Because his motion is facially insufficient, we affirm.
The appellant claims he is due an additional 257 days of credit for time served in the Jackson County Jail against his Columbia County conviction. However, the appellant failed to allege when he was arrested for the Columbia County charge, where in the record the dates of his Columbia County arrest can be located, and that his Columbia County warrant was conveyed to Jackson County. See Gethers v. State, 838 So. 2d 504 (Fla.2003); Travis v. State, 724 So. 2d 119, 120 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
The appellant also alleges that he is entitled to 168 days of prison credit for time spent in the Department of Corrections. However, the appellant has failed to allege any legal theory supporting enti tlement to relief. See, e.g., Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla.1993).
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1993)
- Gethers v. State, 838 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2003)
- Travis v. State, 724 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)