STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
K.C., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Amendment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution because the Second District Court of Appeal in K.C. v. State, 848 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), certified potential conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in S.W. v. State, 664 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). However, we now conclude that these two cases are distinguishable because the statute at issue was amended after the Fifth District’s decision in S.W. Compare § 39.0145, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994) with § 985.216, Fla. Stat. (2001). Therefore, we have determined not to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction in this case.
Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- K.C. v. State, 848 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- S.W. v. State, 664 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)