PAULINE KOZIARA AND KATHLEEN DERIENZO, APPELLANT,

v.

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dorsett v. State, 944 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …hat is inextricably intertwined with the charges being prosecuted.5 Evidence is inextricably intertwined if the evidence is necessary to (1) “adequately describe the deed,” Smith v. State, 866 So. 2d 51, 62 (Fla.2004)(emphasis added); Gray v. State, 873 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Canion v. State, 793 So. 2d 80, 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); (2) provide an intelligent account of the crime(s) charged, Vail v. State, 890 So. 2d 373, 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Burgos v. State, 865 So. 2d 622, 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); A…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Fitzsimmons v. State, 935 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …. 2d 966, 968 (Fla.1994). Such evidence is admissible under section 90.402 because it is a relevant and inseparable part of the act that is in issue and it is necessary to admit the evidence to adequately describe the act. Id. at 968; Gray v. State, 873 So. 2d 374, 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Nevertheless, Fitzsimmons’ actions outside the SouthTrust Bank and the subsequent police chase were not so intertwined with the Regions Bank robbery that it was necessary to describe them in order to accurately explain the R…
• Henrion v. State, 895 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …ions. Therefore, none of the cases apply.” In fact, no one was ever charged with the offense of injuring the infant. A trial court’s decision to admit collateral crime or Williams rule evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Gray v. State, 873 So. 2d 374, 376 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). However, “[t]he admission of improper collateral crime evidence is presumed harmful error because of the danger that a jury will take the bad character or propensity to commit the crime as evidence of guilt of the crime char…

Authorities Cited

• Cafe 207, Inc. v. ST. Johns Cnty., 66 F.3d 272 (11th Cir. 1995)