JOHN ANTHONY SHERIDAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN ANTHONY SHERIDAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
873 So. 2d 617
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm John Anthony Sheridan’s conviction and sentence for third-degree murder. However, we certify that, as to the predicate offenses for habitual offender sentencing, this decision conflicts with the Fourth District’s opinion in Richardson v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1716, — So. 2d -, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
CASANUEVA, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…ourt’s decision is presumed to be correct, the trial court is presumed to have ruled correctly absent a record that demonstrates error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); Roach v. Unemployment Appeals Com’n., 873 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Powers v. Powers, 831 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Compton v. Compton, 701 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). In the absence of a transcript, the trial court’s factual findings are presumed correct. Applegate, 377 So. 2d at 1152…
-
Carvalho v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 51 So. 3d 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…ial court’s judgment is not supported by evidence or by alternative theory). Because there is no transcript, we must assume that the referee’s finding of work-related misconduct is supported by the evidence. See Roach v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 873 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Moran v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 114 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…l court’s judgment is not supported by evidence or by alternative theory). Because there is no transcript, we must assume that the referee’s findings of work-related misconduct are supported by the evidence. See Roach v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 873 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Moran also argues that his former employer waived its right to contest an initial decision to grant benefits at an evidentiary hearing by failing to initially provide separation information pursuant to section 443.151(3)(a), F…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence