DANIEL E. GIBBS, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Daniel E. Gibbs, Sr. appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Gibbs challenged his consecutive habitual offender prison terms for possession and trafficking in cocaine. See Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993).
We reverse as Gibbs’s claim was not considered on the merits. The facts as detailed in Gibbs v. State, 698 So. 2d 1206 (Fla.1997), quashing Gibbs v. State, 676 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), along with the trial excerpts provided by Gibbs to this court permit such review. The inquiry on remand is whether Gibbs’s claim for relief in light of Hale is apparent from the face of the record. See Nelson v. State, 855 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla.2002); Valdes v. State, 765 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
FARMER, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shahir Selim v. PAN Am. Airways Corp., 889 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…f the CBA did not relieve petitioners of this duty. Id. at 259, 260, 266, 114 S.Ct. 2239. In the second case, the Third District considered the preemption of Florida whis-tleblower claims under the RLA in Roland v. Florida East Coast Railway, LLC, 873 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). The court concluded that the whistleblower claim was not preempted partially based on the rationale of Hawaiian Airlines and partially based on the fact that federal law allows a railroad whistleblower to elect remedies, presumab…
-
Aurora Loan Servs. LLC v. Yuri Senchuk, 36 So. 3d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…6 So. 2d 665, 666 (Fla.1992) (finding that in the absence of inter-district conflict or contrary precedent for the supreme court, the decision of a district court of appeal is binding throughout Florida); see also Roland v. Fla. East Coast Ry., LLC, 873 So. 2d 1271, 1275 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (holding the Florida appellate courts are not bound by federal precedent which is persuasive, not binding, authority) (citations omitted). As such, for these reasons, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment b…
-
Zina Haratz, DDS, P.A. v. Dental Team of Atlantis, LLC, 372 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)…s required to plead the waiver allegation with specificity, Dental Team waived any pleading deficiency by failing to raise the issue below and by agreeing the waiver issue could “be brought up certainly later.” See Roland v. Fla. E. Coast Ry., LLC, 873 So. 2d 1271, 1275 n.6 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (recognizing that pleading deficiencies can be waived if the opposing party proceeds to address the issue on the merits). bring an action is a defect that cannot be cured mid-suit, the failure to comply with a conditio…
Authorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Gibbs v. State, 698 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 1997)
- Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2002)
- Valdes v. State, 765 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Gibbs v. State, 676 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Nelson v. State, 855 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)