RICHARD HENRY GEFFKEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2004-06-04
No. 5D04-185
SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and PALMER, JJ., concur.
873 So. 2d 1289 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

We have carefully considered appellant’s response to the court’s show cause order entered pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999). We find that good cause has not been shown and therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, appellant is prohibited from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions relating to his conviction and sentence in St. Johns Circuit Court case numbers 94-371 and 95-1503. Any pleadings or papers filed in this court relating to those cases must be reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in this state and the Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se pleadings from appellant relating to said cases.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ostolaza v. State, 943 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
    …ns: He is working; he is [*1004] dirty; his boss is going to fire him. Those kinds of reasons.” Other than Rivera’s failure to honor the subpoena, nothing in the record shows that he was either unavailable or unwilling to testify. Cf Smith v. State, 873 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (finding abuse of discretion in trial court’s denial of continuance and noting “that, although the witnesses were avoiding service of a subpoena at the time of trial, on one occasion the witnesses had appeared in court and were w…
  • Perpall v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
    …courts have held that trial courts abuse their discretion in denying continuances where defendants merely served, or attempted to serve, subpoenas to witnesses, even when service of the subpoena was conducted at the last minute. See Smith v. State, 873 So. 2d 1289, 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“Appellant has shown that he exercised due diligence in attempting to serve these two witnesses[.] 6 [FOOTNOTE 4] Given that Riley's failure to appear occurred on a Friday afternoon, whether a writ of bodily attachment co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw