SHARON M. CICHOSKI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SHARON M. CICHOSKI, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
874 So. 2d 695
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a motion to enforce a plea agreement after being sentenced for violating her probation. In her petition, she claims that she negotiated a sentence with one judge, was given time to accomplish certain tasks, and was then given a different sentence by another judge that was contrary to the plea agreement accepted by the first judge. Appellant appeals the order denying the motion to enforce. We affirm, because the proper method of relief is pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934, 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a proper motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850.
STONE, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dellofano v. State, 946 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…Procedure for a “motion to enforce plea agreement.” Therefore, the only avenue available for an appellant to pursue his or her postconviction claim below is a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Cichoski v. State, 874 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (affirming denial of motion to enforce plea agreement on grounds that motion is not authorized- by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure); Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (same). I recognize that wé have ente…
-
Cowan v. State, 940 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
Authorities Cited
- Miller Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)