LEAURENZA EDWARDS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-06-07
No. 1D04-0154
BOOTH, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
874 So. 2d 1242 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Caution
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s response to this court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed because the notice of appeal appeared not to be timely filed is treated as a petition for belated appeal, and this court’s records shall so reflect. The petition for belated appeal is denied. Petitioner’s pending motions for appointment of counsel and for oral argument are also denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BOOTH, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilkinson v. State, 889 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
    …ble for parole after serving twenty-five years. Wilkinson’s sentence was automatic—the court had no discretion. See Buford v. State, 403 So. 2d 943, 954 (Fla.1981); Johnson v. State, 679 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). We note that in Duffy v. State, 874 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), this court reversed and remanded the denial of a motion to correct illegal sentence and instructed the trial court, on remand, to specifically reflect the defendant’s eligibility for parole upon completion of the twenty-five year…
  • Robinson v. State, 955 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
    …ge, except in one respect. We agree with Appellant that, based on the law applicable to his case, he is eligible for parole on the capital sexual battery conviction after serving a minimum mandatory twenty-five-year term. [*1231] See Duffy v. State, 874 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Among other things, Appellant was convicted of sexual battery on a person under 12 years of age. The information alleged that the offense occurred on September 24, 1994. In 1994, section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994),…
  • Williams v. State, 8 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …PER CURIAM. The denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is affirmed. Nevertheless, based on the date of appellant’s offenses, it appears he is in fact eligible for parole. See Duffy v. State, 874 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Hurd v. State, 807 So. 2d 753, 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Johnson v. State, 679 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Dolan v. State, 618 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Although he has no absolute right to parole, he is entitled to pro…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw