VERZURA CONSTRUCTION, INC., ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
OJITO AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
VERZURA CONSTRUCTION, INC., ETC., APPELLANT,
OJITO AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
875 So. 2d 672
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As the appellee, Ojito and Associates, Inc. [OAI], properly concedes, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on its motion for summary judgment where OAI had been dropped as a party. See Sas v. Postman, 687 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Therefore, we reverse the order granting OAI’s motion for summary judgment.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Hollywood v. Witt, 939 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…t with Florida law, which provides that where an award of attorney’s fees is dependent upon the judgment obtained, the reversal of the underlying judgment necessitates the reversal of the fee award. See, e.g., Keybank Nat'l Ass’n v. Int’l Fin. Bank, 875 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Marty v. Bainter, 727 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Further, just as our reversal of the underlying judgment in the initial appeal necessarily implied the reversal of the…
-
Hickman v. Barclay's Int'l Realty, Inc., 12 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…arclay’s International Realty, Inc., 5 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), we reversed the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of Aaserod. Therefore, we reverse the fees award as well. See Keybank Nat’l Ass’n v. Int’l Fin. Bank, 875 So. 2d 672, 672-73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Marty v. Bainter, 727 So. 2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). STEVENSON, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Irena Eugenia SAS and Elisabeth Patten v. Honorable Alan Postman, 687 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)