STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
WARREN LOVETT, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
WARREN LOVETT, APPELLEE
875 So. 2d 765
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In light of the decision in State v. Harris, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S230, — So. 2d -, 2004 WL 1064790 (Fla. May 13, 2004), we reverse and remand for consideration of the State’s petition to commit appellant as a sexually violent predator. See also Murray v. Regier, 872 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2002).
ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ„ SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Benjamin v. State, 230 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…nt files a motion to withdraw a plea before sentencing under [rule] 3.170(f), the trial court must either deny the motion for facial insufficiency or grant an evidentiary hearing to develop the facts surrounding the entry of the plea.” Lee v. State, 875 So. 2d 765, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). [*955] The trial court made no inquiry as to the potential for conflict where counsel remarked that Benjamin had “buyer’s remorse.” See Grainger v. State, 906 So. 2d 380, 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[Counsel’s] ‘buyer’s remorse…
-
Tavaris Jones v. State, 885 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…rity for such a disposition and we are aware of no precedent that would support it. Moreover, the motion to withdraw was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f), not Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(0. See Lee v. State, 875 So. 2d 765, 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“Rule 3.170(f) clearly contemplates that motions filed before sentencing will also be ruled upon before sentencing.”). Accordingly, we reverse and remand because the record does not contain sufficient inquiry to “refute app…
-
Kervins Thelus v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- Murray v. Regier, 872 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2002)