STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

KIMBERLY HENDERSON, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Brinkmann v. Tyron Francois, 184 So. 3d 504 (Fla. 2016)
  …ortunity to intervene .and be heard. That it did not actually participate in litigation does not preclude us; nor did it preclude the lower courts, from considering Francois’ claim. See Martin Mem’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tenet Healthsystem Hosp., Inc., 875 So. 2d 797, 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“[I]t seems to us relatively clear that, once the Attorney General or appropriate state attorney has been served, he or she may choose either to appear or not. However, in the latter event, non-participation has no effect o…
• Honorable Jeff Atwater v. City OF Weston, 64 So. 3d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …ial court in this case does not obtain jurisdiction it never had simply because two of the four defendants who should have been dismissed from the action have elected not to appeal. Cf. Martin Mem. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tenet Healthsystems Hosp., Inc., 875 So. 2d 797, 799-801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (court would not dismiss appeal from declaratory judgment finding statute unconstitutional where state agency and Attorney General did not appeal judgment but were proper parties to declaratory action and participated at…
• Venice HMA, LLC v. Sarasota Cnty. & Sarasota Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist., 198 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …gent Care Provision Indisputably, the 2003 special law applies only in Sarasota County. Thus, it falls, within the ambit of article X, section 12(g) of the Florida Constitution.10 See Martin Mem'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tenet HealthSystem Hosps., Inc., 875 So. 2d 797, 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding law that applied to only hospitals located in five counties was a special or local law). The Private Hospitals are for-profit entities. “Privilege,” under article II, section ll(a)(12), is a broad term that include…

Authorities Cited

• Dixon v. State, 812 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
• Maddox v. State, 862 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)