ANGEL RUIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANGEL RUIZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
875 So. 2d 808
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Adams v. State, 831 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Margia R. Forte v. Florida Unemployment Appeals, 899 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…discharged from her employment based on misconduct related to her employment. The standard of review of a decision by the UAC is whether the decision is supported by substantial competent evidence. See Rietter v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 875 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Kelly v. Dade County School Bd., 872 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Under section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), a claimant is disqualified from receiving benefits if he has been discharged by his employer for misconduc…
-
A&S Ent., LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…3 So. 2d 1235, 1236–37 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “The standard of review of an administrative agency’s adjudicative findings is whether those findings are supported by substantial competent record evidence.” Rietter v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 875 So. 2d 808, 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (citing Gfrorer v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 864 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). Thus, the final agency decision cannot be reversed unless the action taken is not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the recor…
Authorities Cited
- Adams v. State, 831 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)