TERESA SUTTON AND ROBERT SUTTON, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This opinion, a special concurrence, clarifies that appellate reversals in dissolution of marriage cases, particularly under no-fault law, generally do not reverse the dissolution itself unless expressly stated, and addresses potential misinterpretations of prior rulings.
Appellate reversals in dissolution of marriage cases, especially under no-fault law, do not reverse the dissolution of the marriage itself unless explicitly stated in the opinion.
The concurring opinion addresses concerns about the majority's reference to a prior case, Smith v. Smith, and clarifies the implications of appellate …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fitzgerald v. S. Broward Hosp. Dist., 840 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); McClanahan v. State, Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, 854 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
FARMER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Fitzgerald v. S. Broward Hosp. Dist., 840 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- McCLANAHAN v. State, 854 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)