WILLIAM GOLFIN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM GOLFIN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
875 So. 2d 1284
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Harmon v. State, 438 So. 2d 369 (Fla.1983); Ratushinak v. State, 517 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
P.G. v. E.W., 75 So. 3d 777 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…[*781] court’s determination that the Former Wife's version of the circumstances regarding the birth of the child was more credible than that of the Former Husband, we must accept the facts as testified to by the Former Wife. See De Uejbe v. Wehbe, 875 So. 2d 1284, 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) ("The determination of the credibility of witnesses is for the trial court, not this court.”). However, we review de novo the trial court’s application of the statute to those facts. See Kephart v. Hadi, 932 So. 2d 1086, 108…
Authorities Cited
- Harmon v. State, 438 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1983)
- Ratushinak v. State, 517 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)