BENJAMIN TAYLOR, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Mosley, 149 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 2014)
  …holding that defendants could not receive consecutive PRR sentences when the crimes arose out of a single criminal episode were called into question by Reeves. See id. (discussing Boyd v. State, 988 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Gonzalez v. State, 876 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Williams v. State, 804 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); and Philmore v. State, 760 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)). Young explained that the prior district court decisions holding that defendants could not receive consecutive PRR…
• Gorham v. State, 993 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …pprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), i.e., that the jury’s verdict does not reflect the findings necessary to support a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum for a simple burglary. See Gonzalez v. State, 876 So. 2d 658, 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (finding that whether an assault or battery occurred during the course of a burglary is a fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum for Apprendi purposes). Rule 3.800(a) is a proper vehicle to…
• Young v. State, 37 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …ndant alleges that the trial court erred by imposing consecutive prison releasee reoffen-der (hereinafter, “PRR”) sentences for counts two through six. In support, he cites Boyd v. State, 988 So. 2d 1242, 1244 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2008); Gonzalez v. State, 876 So. 2d 658, 661-662 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004); Williams v. State, 804 So. 2d 572, 573 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); and Philmore v. State, 760 So. 2d 239, 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The foundation upon which each of the cited cases is based and the precedential value are calle…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Warren v. Warren, 643 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)