JEFFREY SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEFFREY SMITH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
876 So. 2d 684
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. See e.g. White v. State, 866 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief and again certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
FARMER, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ware v. State, 124 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…chalant is legally insignificant as to whether he unlawfully exposed his genitals. Ware would be no less guilty of violating the two statutes if [*391] L.R. had remained calm and lampooned Ware’s crude behavior by laughing at him. See Ross v. State, 876 So. 2d 684, 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (evidence defendant “deliberately wore short shorts that were substantially sure to lead to the exposure of his penis” sufficient to establish guilt despite argument with witness who told him to “tuck it in”). As the Florida…
Authorities Cited
- Ferman Carlos Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Reyes v. State, 854 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- White v. State, 866 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)