CARMEN J. PUJOL, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
CARMEN J. PUJOL, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
876 So. 2d 730
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1980)(holding that the Commissions order is entitled to a presumption of correctness on appeal); Nisbet v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 769 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(holding that a finding of disqualification of unemployment benefits will not be disturbed if it is supported by competent, substantial record evidence).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bauder v. State, 923 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…found Mr. Bauder in direct criminal contempt and sentenced him without complying with the rule, the judgment and sentence must be reversed.1 See Gopman v. Washington Mut. Bank, F.A., 885 So. 2d 1037, 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Kendrick v. Kendrick, 876 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Patz v. State, 691 So. 2d 66, 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(stating that “[t]he case law in this area is very clear that strict adherence to the rule is absolutely imperative. ‘Scrupulous compliance with Rule 3.830 is required because i…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Nisbet v. Publix Super Mkts., Inc., 769 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)