ANDREW HAYES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-07-14
No. 3D03-446
Before FLETCHER, SHEVIN and SHEPHERD, JJ.
876 So. 2d 1277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Wilson v. State, 753 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brunache v. State, 901 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …not being awarded the correct amount of gain time by the Department of Corrections, the defendant must first exhaust his administrative remedies within the Department and if dissatisfied, may thereafter seek appellate review. See Richmond v. State, 876 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Marshall v. State, 796 So. 2d 631, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Although the question is not now before us, the defendant appears to have a mistaken impression regarding the gain time law. See Rivera v. State, 790 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw