G. PIERCE WOODS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, APPELLANTS,
v.
CORNELIA LEWIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the award of temporary partial disability benefits but reversed the award of permanent total disability benefits as premature.
A hospital employee suffered a back injury and hypertension, leading to a diagnosis of a herniated disk. She sought various disability benefits.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Claim For Temporary Partial Disability Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The claimant, Cornelia Lewis, worked in patient care at G. Pierce Woods Memorial Hospital when she suffered an injury to her lower back while lifting a patient on June 30, 1997. The claimant was diagnosed with a segmental herniated disk fragment in the lumbar spine. The elaim- ant also suffered from hypertension that prevented a surgical solution to her back problems. The claimant has received orthopedic as well as psychological treatment.
The claimant filed a petition requesting temporary total and temporary partial disability benefits as well as permanent total disability benefits. The judge of compensation claims determined that the claimant’s physical and psychiatric conditions were causally related to her work injury and awarded her temporary partial disability benefits and permanent total disability benefits.
We affirm the award of temporary partial disability benefits because there is competent substantial evidence to support the JCC’s award of these benefits. See Neavins v. City of St. Petersburg, 823 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).1 We reverse the permanent total disability benefits as premature because the claimant had not yet reached psychiatric maximum medical improvement (“MMI”) and there was no exception to the MMI requirement that was applicable to the claimant. See Rivendell of Ft. Walton v. Petway, 833 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur. . Appellants argue that the JCC erred by admitting the testimony of Dr. Hager. We have concluded that any error in admitting the testimony of Dr. Hager was harmless. Appellant’s other arguments regarding the continuance of the final hearing and cumulative errors are rejected without further comment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. State, 855 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003)…must be established by preponderance of the evidence.” In analyzing whether a defendant’s consent to a search is voluntary, a court should consider the totality of the circumstances around the granting of consent to the search. See Norman v. State, 879 So. 2d 643, 646-47 (Fla.1980). When the validity of a search rests on consent, the State has the burden of proving that the necessary consent was obtained and that it was freely and voluntarily given. See Reynolds, 592 So. 2d at 1086. In a situation where ther…
-
Olmo v. Rehabcare Starmed/SRS, 930 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…d this way: [W]e have consistently held that a claim for impairment or permanent disability benefits made before a claimant has reached MMI[1] or received 98 weeks of temporary benefits is premature. See, e.g., G. Pierce Woods Mem’l Hosp. v. Lewis, 879 So. 2d 643, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (finding claim for PTD premature absent a showing of MMI or applicable “exception to the MMI requirement”); Metro. Title & Guar. Co. v. Muniz, 806 So. 2d 637, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“Until an impairment rating is assigned,…
-
Cooper v. Buddy Freddy's Rest. & Travelers Ins. Co., 889 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…r.” Accordingly, we have consistently held that a claim for impairment or permanent disability benefits made before, a claimant has reached MMI or received 98 weeks of temporary benefits is premature. See, e.g., G. Pierce Woods Mem’l Hosp. v. Lewis, 879 So. 2d 643, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (finding claim for PTD premature absent a showing of MMI or applicable “exception to the MMI requirement”); Metro. Title & Guar. Co. v. Muniz, 806 So. 2d 637, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“Until an impairment rating is assigned,…
Authorities Cited
- Rivendell OF FT. Walton & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc. v. Petway, 833 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
- Neavins v. City OF ST. Petersburg, 823 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)