JUAN LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUAN LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
881 So. 2d 36
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Alvarez v. State, 358 So. 2d 10, 12 (Fla.1978) (“We also reject petitioner’s contention that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite. Although no person can predict the maximum length of time which can be served by a prisoner under a sentence of life, this in itself does not render a life sentence impermissibly indefinite.”) (Footnote omitted).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…ague and indefinite. Although no person can predict the maximum length of time which can be served by a prisoner under a sentence of life, this in itself does not render a life sentence impermissibly indefinite.”) (footnote omitted); Lopez v. State, 881 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).…
-
Carrero v. State, 903 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Woodley, 695 So. 2d 297 (Fla.1997); Lopez v. State, 881 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).…
-
Johnson v. Crosby, 897 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…ague and indefinite. Although no person can predict the maximum length of time which can be served by a prisoner under a sentence of life, this in itself does not render a life sentence impermissibly indefinite.”) (footnote omitted); Lopez v. State, 881 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).…
Authorities Cited
- Alphonso Alvarez v. State, 358 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1978)