KENNETH ELLISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-08-19
No. 1D03-2777
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
881 So. 2d 66 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Walker v. State, 853 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Joseph v. Joseph, 908 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …the trial court was not jurisdictionally barred from considering the petition to modify under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(c) and, thus, had erred in dismissing it, we reversed and remanded for further proceedings. See Joseph v. Joseph, 881 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The parties rightfully concede on appeal that Case No. 1D03-1510 controls the instant proceedings. We had not issued our decision, id., when the trial court issued the dismissal order now challenged by the former husband. Becaus…
  • Horowitz v. Horowitz, 139 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …he former husband responded that his petition seeks to modify the support awards prospectively; and, therefore, the modification proceedings will not interfere with the subject matter of the pending appeal. For support, he cites to Joseph v. Joseph, 881 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), and Cooper v. Cooper, 69 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Analysis Harmonizing the cases, we conclude that the trial court may consider the modification petition incident to its jurisdiction under Rule 9.600(c); however, it may…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw