ALVIN FREDERICK WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALVIN FREDERICK WILSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
881 So. 2d 563
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in appellant’s latest appeal and affirm. Moreover, we hold that his successive petitions constitute an abuse of the judicial system. See, e.g., Carlisle v. State, 849 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we order Wilson to show cause within 30 days from the date of this opinion why he should not be precluded from filing any further pro se pleadings raising these issues in this criminal case. See, e.g., State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999); Steele v. State, 859 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. State, 881 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…PER CURIAM. In Wilson v. State, 881 So. 2d 563, 2004 WL 1057800 (Fla. 5th DCA May 7, 2004), appellant was ordered to show cause why he should not be precluded from filing further pro se motions. See, e.g., State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999). We have carefully considered appellant’s respo…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Steele v. State, 859 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Robert E.H. Carlisle v. State, 849 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)