TIMOTHY BLACK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TIMOTHY BLACK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
881 So. 2d 688
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises several issues on direct appeal. We affirm all issues on appeal without comment except Appellant’s due process challenge to the sexual predator act. This Court has already resolved this issue against Appellant. See Frazier v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So. 2d -, 2004 WL 221043 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6, 2004); Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Legg v. State, 15 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ar, unambiguous, and conveys clear and definite meaning, there is no reason for resorting to the rules of statutory interpretation and construction, and the statute must be given its plain and obvious meaning.” Vreuls v. Progressive Employer Servs., 881 So. 2d 688, 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Section 322.2605, Florida Statutes (2008), plainly provides that the court shall require a person adjudicated incompetent pursuant to section 744.331 to surrender his or her driver’s license. It references no other statute.…
Authorities Cited
- Ferman Carlos Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)