LOLA ALSTON, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
LOLA ALSTON, APPELLANT,
CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
882 So. 2d 436
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm a judgment denying Alston’s claim for attorney’s fees for the city’s failure to disclose a public record sought pursuant to section 119.12, Florida Statutes. The record supports the trial court’s conclusion that the city had a good faith and reasonable belief that Alston’s request applied only to documents under the control of the parks and recreation department and that Alston failed to establish that the city unlawfully withheld police department records.
STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. v. McADAM, 965 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…ust be whether, after all conflicts in the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom have been resolved in favor of the verdict on appeal, there is substantial, competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment.”); see also Lane v. Cold, 882 So. 2d 436, 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding action for breach of fiduciary duty may be maintained where, “A relationship exist[s] with respect to the acts or omissions upon which the malpractice claim is based,” and a party may demonstrate this relationship b…
-
Rodriguez v. The City OF KEY W., 981 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…rt [its] ... claim of the nonexistence of a genuine issue of material fact, the opposing party ... must demonstrate the existence of an issue or issues either by countervailing facts or justifiable inferences from the facts presented.” Lane v. Cold, 882 So. 2d 436, 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). In the instant case, Rodriguez’s lawsuit claimed that the City was applying its ordinances in a discriminatory manner because in January 2003, the City denied his request for additional PVH licenses. In support of its moti…
-
Schmidt v. Antunez (S.D. Fla. 2024)…ractice, see generally Complaint, nor could they have, since all of the Defendants' allegedly unlawful acts took place after the Agreement was terminated and after the attorney-client relationship between the parties was dissolved. See Lane v. Cold, 882 So. 2d 436, 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“With respect to establishing [legal malpractice], it is not sufficient merely to show that an attorney-client relationship existed between the parties, it is essential that the plaintiff show that the relationship existed…