ALBERT WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALBERT WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
882 So. 2d 439
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Sanders v. State, 847 So. 2d 504, 506-08 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (en banc), review pending, No. SC03-0640 (Fla. Apr. 8, 2003).
WOLF, C.J., and BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wisznia v. Leon Cnty. Div. OF Animal Control & Preferred Governmental Claims Solutions, 902 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…ICATION PER CURIAM. We grant appellees’ Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification to the extent that we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following: In this workers’ compensation case, as in Cromartie v. City of St. Petersburg, 882 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), our review of the record satisfies us that the record does not contain competent and substantial evidence to support the determination of the judge of compensation claims that clear and convincing evidence existed sufficient to…
-
Manuel v. Amstaff & Liberty Mut., 915 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…evidence to support a determination that clear and convincing evidence [*681] existed sufficient to reject the EMA’s opinion that claimant sustained a psychiatric injury as a result of his compensable accident); Cromartie v. City of St. Petersburg, 882 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Walgreen Co. v. Carver, 770 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the second issue on appeal and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED. ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NOR…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Tatakis, 847 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Sanders v. State, 847 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)